$coord 0.0 2.7 0.0 cu 0.0 -2.7 0.0 cu 0.0 -6.1 0.0 f 0.0 6.1 0.0 f 2.4 0.0 0.0 f -2.4 0.0 0.0 f $end
The high-spin case, a doublet with an excess alpha electron at each Cu atom,
"aa" in an obvious notation, preserves
The preparation of broken-symmetry start-MOs can be done with DEFINE (semi-)automatically. Prerequisite is a converged wave function for the
high-spin state in
If in this case one enters flip in the orbital definition menu,
DEFINE selects the occupied valence orbitals of the system (by an orbital
energy criterion, which one can usually accept, unless the system is highly
charged and the orbital energies are shifted). Next a Boys orbital
localization procedure is carried out, which - depending on the size of the
problem - may take some time. Then the user is asked:
ENTER INDICES OF ATOMS OR ELEMENT TO BE MANIPULATED
(example: 1,2-3 or "mn")
In case of our above example one may enter "cu", which immediately
leads to the following output (a def-SV(P) basis and the B-P functional
were used for the high-spin state):
As evident from the second column, for each Cu atom five localized alpha and
four localized beta orbitals were generated which are of d-type (the sixth
column labelled "d" shows values close to 1, the other columns such close to 0).
The six columns at the right show the individual contributions of the six
cartesian d-functions.
What has to be done to generate start MOs for the "ba"-case? Obviously one of
the five localized alpha spin orbitals from the first Cu atom (atom label
1 cu) has to become a beta spin orbital. These five orbitals have the
indices 15, 18, 20, 22, 23. In order to avoid linear dependencies,
it is advisable to take the orbital that has no beta-analogue. This can be
found by comparing the contributions of the six d-functions. In the present
example this is the case for the localized alpha orbitals 15 and
18: in contrast to all localized beta orbitals they show significant
contributions from
From this input one may start the SCF(HF/DFT)-procedure. For recommended
choices of DFT functionals and formulae to calculate the coupling parameters
from these energy differences please consult the papers of the above-mentioned
authors. For reasons of economy, a pre-optimization by a pure (non-hybrid)
DFT-functional is reasonable.
Important: For the converged wave function one should check, whether the
resulting state is really the desired one. This can quite reliably be done
by a Mulliken population analysis. For this purpose, add $pop
to the control file, type ridft -proper or dscf -proper,
respectively, and check the signs of the calculated numbers of unpaired
electrons in the output.
RELEVANT LMOS FOR ATOM 1 cu
ALPHA:
index occupation "energy" s p d f (dxx dyy dzz dxy dxz dyz)
15 1.000 -0.357 0.01 0.00 0.98 0.20 0.27 0.01 0.50 0.00 0.00
18 1.000 -0.357 0.01 0.00 0.98 0.20 0.27 0.01 0.50 0.00 0.00
20 1.000 -0.335 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
22 1.000 -0.333 0.01 0.00 0.99 0.13 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.51
23 1.000 -0.333 0.01 0.00 0.99 0.14 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.49
BETA:
39 1.000 -0.326 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.50
41 1.000 -0.326 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.50
43 1.000 -0.321 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
46 1.001 -0.318 0.05 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.43 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
RELEVANT LMOS FOR ATOM 2 cu
ALPHA:
index occupation "energy" s p d f (dxx dyy dzz dxy dxz dyz)
16 1.000 -0.357 0.01 0.00 0.98 0.20 0.27 0.01 0.50 0.00 0.00
17 1.000 -0.357 0.01 0.00 0.98 0.20 0.27 0.01 0.50 0.00 0.00
19 1.000 -0.335 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
21 1.000 -0.333 0.01 0.00 0.99 0.13 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.51
24 1.000 -0.333 0.01 0.00 0.99 0.14 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.49
BETA:
40 1.000 -0.326 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.50
42 1.000 -0.326 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.50
44 1.000 -0.321 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
45 1.001 -0.318 0.05 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.43 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
a2b : FLIPPING ALPHA TO BETA (default)
b2a : FLIPPING BETA TO ALPHA
r : repeat atom choice
a2b
15
and after confirming the replacement of original MOs with the generated
start-MOs one is finally asked
It is advisable to modify damping and orbital shift in the following way:
$scfdamp start=5.000 step=0.050 min=0.500
$scforbitalshift automatic=1.0
$scfiterlimit 999
Do you want to replace the corresponding entries in the control-file? (y)
which should be confirmed, as otherwise the prepared spin state might be
destroyed during the SCF iterations.
Next: The General Options Menu
Up: Generating MO Start Vectors
Previous: Roothaan Parameters
Contents
Index
TURBOMOLE