The unrelaxed first-order properties are calculated from the variational
excited states Lagrangian [89], which for the calculation
of unrelaxed properties is decomposed into a ground state contribution and
Lagrange functional for the excitation energy which leads to expressions for
difference densities (or changes of the density matrix upon excitations):
![]() |
(9.20) | ||
![]() |
(9.21) |
In the present implementation, the ground-state and the difference
density matrices are evaluated separately.
The calculation of excited-state first-order properties thus
requires also the calculation of the ground-state density matrix.
In addition, the left (
The single-substitution parts of the excited-states Lagrangian
multipliers
For the calculation of first-order properties for excited states,
the keyword
To obtain orbital-relaxed first-order properties or analytic derivatives
(gradients) the Lagrange functional for the excited state
in Eq. (9.18) is--analogously
to the treatment of ground states--augmented by the equations for
the SCF orbitals and
external perturbations are (formally) included in the SCF step,
i.e. also in the Fock operator.
Since relaxed densities or often computed in connection with geometry
optimizations for individual states (rather than simultaneously for
many states) a Lagrangian for the total energy of the excited state
is used. This has the advantage the only one equation for Lagrangian multipliers
for cluster amplitudes (
The following is an example for the CC2 single point calculation for an
an excited state gradient (not that in the present implementation it is
not possible to compute gradients for several excited states at the same time):
CCNE0-s--m-xxx.
exprop must be added with appropriate options to the
data group $excitations; else the input is same as for the
calculation of excitation energies:
$ricc2
cc2
$response
fop unrelaxed_only operators=diplen,qudlen
$excitations
irrep=a1 nexc=2
exprop states=all operators=diplen,qudlen
Because for calculation of excited-states first-order properties
also the (unrelaxed) ground-state density is evaluated,
it is recommended to specify also ground-state first-order
properties in the input, since they are obtained without extra costs.
Again the construction of gradients requires the same variational densities
as needed for relaxed one-electron properties and the solution of the
same equations. The construction of the gradient contributions from
one- and two-electron densities and derivative integrals takes approximately
the same time as for ground states (approx. 3-4 SCF iterations) and only
minor extra disk space.
The implementation of the excited state gradients for the RI-CC2 approach
is described in detail in Ref. [90].
There also some information about the performance of CC2 for structures and
vibrational frequencies of excited states can found.
$ricc2
cc2
$excitations
irrep=a1 nexc=2
exprop states=all operators=diplen,qudlen
xgrad states=(a1 2)
A different input is again required for geometry optimizations:
in this case the model and excited state for which the geometry should
be optimized have to be specified in the data group $ricc2
with the keyword geoopt:
$ricc2
geoopt model=cc2 state=(a1 2)
$excitations
irrep=a1 nexc=2
exprop states=all operators=diplen,qudlen
Next: Visualization of densities and
Up: First-Order Properties and Gradients
Previous: Ground State Properties, Gradients
Contents
Index
TURBOMOLE